Re: [PATCH 0/5] ppc64 scheduler fixes

2011-09-20 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 10:19 +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote: > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra > > Are you OK if Ben takes this, or would you prefer to send it via the > scheduler tree? I was expecting Ben to pick it up, and I see he already did so. Thanks!

Re: [PATCH 0/5] ppc64 scheduler fixes

2011-09-19 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 10:19 +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote: > Hi Peter, > > > On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 12:33 +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote: > > > Here are a set of ppc64 scheduler fixes that help with some > > > multi node performance issues. > > > > They look fine to me. I'll probably ping you when I'

Re: [PATCH 0/5] ppc64 scheduler fixes

2011-09-19 Thread Anton Blanchard
Hi Peter, > On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 12:33 +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote: > > Here are a set of ppc64 scheduler fixes that help with some > > multi node performance issues. > > They look fine to me. I'll probably ping you when I'll rip out all > that SD_NODES_PER_DOMAIN crap for good, but until then

Re: [PATCH 0/5] ppc64 scheduler fixes

2011-07-25 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 12:33 +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote: > Here are a set of ppc64 scheduler fixes that help with some > multi node performance issues. They look fine to me. I'll probably ping you when I'll rip out all that SD_NODES_PER_DOMAIN crap for good, but until then I'm fine with you fiddl

[PATCH 0/5] ppc64 scheduler fixes

2011-07-25 Thread Anton Blanchard
Here are a set of ppc64 scheduler fixes that help with some multi node performance issues. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev