Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18a539ZiXmAXeY+eK9MdUjOkwfvlvR4PUC8vLN
hv7FFOkt1BgOy18T2Tf8fQgBcT+SMke7QjZMwzOtjX3HPEZzfI
I86h59GhTM7GU39vE50ww==
> Hmmm... Shouldn't this sort of change come
> with an update to the 8641 defconfig too?
Yes, good point. This upda
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 11:54:34AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 13 July 2007, Mark A. Greer wrote:
> > I really like what you've done here, thanks.
> >
> > The patches don't apply straight up so what other patches do these go
> > on top of?
>
> They are meant to apply on top of powerpc
On Friday 13 July 2007, Mark A. Greer wrote:
> I really like what you've done here, thanks.
>
> The patches don't apply straight up so what other patches do these go
> on top of?
They are meant to apply on top of powerpc.git. I found now that
the first patch has a trivial reject against the for-2
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:01:56PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Since this was brought up by Mark, here is a resend of the
> Kconfig cleanup patches that have not been merged so far,
> with updates for the comments I received.
>
> I stumbled over another bug in the process, and fear I have
> foun
Since this was brought up by Mark, here is a resend of the
Kconfig cleanup patches that have not been merged so far,
with updates for the comments I received.
I stumbled over another bug in the process, and fear I have
found a can of worms there (not opened yet): There are
still many files under a
