On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 14:47:45 +0530, Kajol Jain wrote:
> Patchset adds new macros for mem_hops field which can be
> used to represent remote-node, socket and board level details.
>
> Currently the code had macro for HOPS_0, which corresponds
> to data coming from another core but same node.
> Add ne
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 05:35:41PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo writes:
> > Em Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 02:47:45PM +0530, Kajol Jain escreveu:
> >> Patchset adds new macros for mem_hops field which can be
> >> used to represent remote-node, socket and board level details.
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo writes:
> Em Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 02:47:45PM +0530, Kajol Jain escreveu:
>> Patchset adds new macros for mem_hops field which can be
>> used to represent remote-node, socket and board level details.
>>
>> Currently the code had macro for HOPS_0, which corresponds
>> to da
Em Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 02:47:45PM +0530, Kajol Jain escreveu:
> Patchset adds new macros for mem_hops field which can be
> used to represent remote-node, socket and board level details.
>
> Currently the code had macro for HOPS_0, which corresponds
> to data coming from another core but same node
Patchset adds new macros for mem_hops field which can be
used to represent remote-node, socket and board level details.
Currently the code had macro for HOPS_0, which corresponds
to data coming from another core but same node.
Add new macros for HOPS_1 to HOPS_3 to represent
remote-node, socket an
