Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fedora kernel patch review

2010-02-05 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 08:35:52AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >Hi All, > >Below are the set of ppc/ppc64 specific patches that Fedora has been >carrying for a very long time now. It would be good to get some eyes >on them to see if they could just be incorporated upstream. David, I think you are th

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fedora kernel patch review

2010-02-05 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 08:53:54AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >Provide a modalias entry for VIO devices in sysfs. I believe >this was another initrd generation bugfix for anaconda. Bah, subject on this should have been [PATCH 3/4] Provide VIO modalias ___

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fedora kernel patch review

2010-02-05 Thread Josh Boyer
Provide a modalias entry for VIO devices in sysfs. I believe this was another initrd generation bugfix for anaconda. --- diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c index f988672..12a0851 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vio.c @@ -294,9 +29

[PATCH 0/4] Fedora kernel patch review

2010-02-05 Thread Josh Boyer
Hi All, Below are the set of ppc/ppc64 specific patches that Fedora has been carrying for a very long time now. It would be good to get some eyes on them to see if they could just be incorporated upstream. josh ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-de