Stefan Roscher writes:
> The processing of events with a timer controlled polling is not the "typical"
> way how you should handle adapter events.
Do you mean it's not typical in Linux (I would have said it was), or
it's not the way that the firmware architects and implementers thought
the eHEA h
On Tuesday 10 June 2008 00:28:16 Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Stefan Roscher writes:
>
> > This patchset contains two changes for IB/ehca and ibmebus.
> >
> > The first patch enables ibmebus_request_irq() to optionally return the
> > IRQ number, which is used by the second patch to trigger EOI in cas
Stefan Roscher writes:
> This patchset contains two changes for IB/ehca and ibmebus.
>
> The first patch enables ibmebus_request_irq() to optionally return the
> IRQ number, which is used by the second patch to trigger EOI in case of
> lost interrupts.
At first sight it seems like a very bad i
This patchset contains two changes for IB/ehca and ibmebus.
The first patch enables ibmebus_request_irq() to optionally return the
IRQ number, which is used by the second patch to trigger EOI in case of
lost interrupts.
They should apply cleanly against 2.6.26 git tree.
Thanks
Stefan
_
