Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Valentine Barshak wrote:
>> The major difference is that the original implements each chip connected
>> NDFC banks as a
>> separate MTD device. Here I try to have one MTD device spread on all chips
>> found.
>> However, the chips should have equal ID'
Hi Valentine,
On Friday 26 October 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> > The major difference is that the original implements each chip connected
> > NDFC banks as a separate MTD device. Here I try to have one MTD device
> > spread on all chips found. How
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Valentine Barshak wrote:
> The major difference is that the original implements each chip connected NDFC
> banks as a
> separate MTD device. Here I try to have one MTD device spread on all chips
> found.
> However, the chips should have equal ID's and sizes, but I've never se
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:30:58 +0400
Valentine Barshak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've worked in parallel with Stefan Roese on the new OF NDFC support.
> This version (as well as Stefan's) is based on the original NDFC driver by
> Thomas Gleixner.
> The major difference is that the original imple
I've worked in parallel with Stefan Roese on the new OF NDFC support.
This version (as well as Stefan's) is based on the original NDFC driver by
Thomas Gleixner.
The major difference is that the original implements each chip connected NDFC
banks as a
separate MTD device. Here I try to have one MT
