Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 16:21 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 11:57 +0900, Ishizaki Kou wrote:
> > > This patch cleans up xmon to keep consistency.
> > >
> > > In xmon, we should use console I/O functions that are named the
On 7/25/07, Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 16:21 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Nah, keep it xmon_puts, since it doesn't take a stream argument and
> > define a "puts" for use by xmon core.
>
> But then it needs to add a newline .. and we've gone aroun
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 16:21 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 11:57 +0900, Ishizaki Kou wrote:
> > This patch cleans up xmon to keep consistency.
> >
> > In xmon, we should use console I/O functions that are named the same
> > as user space stdio functions. But commit
>
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 11:57 +0900, Ishizaki Kou wrote:
> This patch cleans up xmon to keep consistency.
>
> In xmon, we should use console I/O functions that are named the same
> as user space stdio functions. But commit
> 4d404edce30f911004850d472e05a31efd751662 broke this consistency.
>
> Signe
This patch cleans up xmon to keep consistency.
In xmon, we should use console I/O functions that are named the same
as user space stdio functions. But commit
4d404edce30f911004850d472e05a31efd751662 broke this consistency.
Signed-off-by: Kou Ishizaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Index: linux-powerpc-
