Re: [PATCH] vdso: Improve cmd_vdso_check to check all dynamic relocations

On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 8:58 AM Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > > Le 04/12/2022 à 05:50, Fangrui Song a écrit : > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 4:46 PM Fangrui Song wrote: > >> > >> On 2022-11-14, Christophe Leroy wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> Le 28/09/2022 à 07:25, Fangrui Song a écrit : > On Sat, Sep

Re: [PATCH] vdso: Improve cmd_vdso_check to check all dynamic relocations

Le 04/12/2022 à 05:50, Fangrui Song a écrit : > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 4:46 PM Fangrui Song wrote: >> >> On 2022-11-14, Christophe Leroy wrote: >>> >>> >>> Le 28/09/2022 à 07:25, Fangrui Song a écrit : On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 12:53 AM Fangrui Song wrote: > > On 2022-08-30, Fangrui

Re: [PATCH] vdso: Improve cmd_vdso_check to check all dynamic relocations

On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 4:46 PM Fangrui Song wrote: > > On 2022-11-14, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > > > >Le 28/09/2022 à 07:25, Fangrui Song a écrit : > >> On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 12:53 AM Fangrui Song wrote: > >>> > >>> On 2022-08-30, Fangrui Song wrote: > The actual intention is that no d

Re: [PATCH] vdso: Improve cmd_vdso_check to check all dynamic relocations

On 2022-11-14, Christophe Leroy wrote: Le 28/09/2022 à 07:25, Fangrui Song a écrit : On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 12:53 AM Fangrui Song wrote: On 2022-08-30, Fangrui Song wrote: The actual intention is that no dynamic relocation exists. However, some GNU ld ports produce unneeded R_*_NONE. (If

Re: [PATCH] vdso: Improve cmd_vdso_check to check all dynamic relocations

Le 28/09/2022 à 07:25, Fangrui Song a écrit : > On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 12:53 AM Fangrui Song wrote: >> >> On 2022-08-30, Fangrui Song wrote: >>> The actual intention is that no dynamic relocation exists. However, some >>> GNU ld ports produce unneeded R_*_NONE. (If a port is not care enough to

Re: [PATCH] vdso: Improve cmd_vdso_check to check all dynamic relocations

On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 12:53 AM Fangrui Song wrote: > > On 2022-08-30, Fangrui Song wrote: > >The actual intention is that no dynamic relocation exists. However, some > >GNU ld ports produce unneeded R_*_NONE. (If a port is not care enough to > >determine the exact .rel[a].dyn size, the trailing

Re: [PATCH] vdso: Improve cmd_vdso_check to check all dynamic relocations

On 2022-08-30, Fangrui Song wrote: The actual intention is that no dynamic relocation exists. However, some GNU ld ports produce unneeded R_*_NONE. (If a port is not care enough to determine the exact .rel[a].dyn size, the trailing zeros become R_*_NONE relocations. E.g. powerpc64le ld as of 2.38

[PATCH] vdso: Improve cmd_vdso_check to check all dynamic relocations

The actual intention is that no dynamic relocation exists. However, some GNU ld ports produce unneeded R_*_NONE. (If a port is not care enough to determine the exact .rel[a].dyn size, the trailing zeros become R_*_NONE relocations. E.g. powerpc64le ld as of 2.38 has the issue with defconfig.) R_*_N