On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 09:45 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> >> Can uninorth_fetch_size be marked __devinit then?
> >
> > I'm not sure, and none of the other AGP backend drivers seems to do
> > so...
>
> Well, either it can, or marking "aperture" is wrong, no?
Makes sense,
Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> Can uninorth_fetch_size be marked __devinit then?
>
> I'm not sure, and none of the other AGP backend drivers seems to do
> so...
Well, either it can, or marking "aperture" is wrong, no?
johannes
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Li
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 13:12 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 13:09 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 03:11 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > A module parameter can possibly be shown via sysfs, which isn't a good
> > > idea if the section has been removed, so r
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 13:09 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 03:11 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > A module parameter can possibly be shown via sysfs, which isn't a good
> > idea if the section has been removed, so remove the __devinit
> > annotation.
>
> Under what circumstance
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 03:11 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> A module parameter can possibly be shown via sysfs, which isn't a good
> idea if the section has been removed, so remove the __devinit
> annotation.
Under what circumstances could it be shown in sysfs?
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer
A module parameter can possibly be shown via sysfs, which isn't a good
idea if the section has been removed, so remove the __devinit
annotation.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Also fixes a section mismatch warning.
--- everything.orig/drivers/char/agp/uninorth-agp.c 2008
