Re: [PATCH] ucc_geth: Convert to net_device_ops

2009-03-28 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
timur.t...@gmail.com wrote on 27/03/2009 19:50:30: > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Joakim Tjernlund > wrote: > > > + .ndo_change_mtu = eth_change_mtu, > > I have an old patch for change_mtu support for ucc_geth which I've > been meaning to push upstream. This patch uses thi

Re: [PATCH] ucc_geth: Convert to net_device_ops

2009-03-27 Thread Timur Tabi
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > +       .ndo_change_mtu         = eth_change_mtu, I have an old patch for change_mtu support for ucc_geth which I've been meaning to push upstream. This patch uses this function instead of eth_change_mtu(): +static int ucc_geth_change_

Re: [PATCH] ucc_geth: Convert to net_device_ops

2009-03-24 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
David Miller wrote on 25/03/2009 00:29:13: > From: Joakim Tjernlund > Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:08:53 +0100 > > > David Miller wrote on 24/03/2009 23:49:02: > > > > > > From: Joakim Tjernlund > > > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:45:13 +0100 > > > > > > > I don't follow. Are these mandatory now? T

Re: [PATCH] ucc_geth: Convert to net_device_ops

2009-03-24 Thread David Miller
From: Joakim Tjernlund Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:08:53 +0100 > David Miller wrote on 24/03/2009 23:49:02: > > > > From: Joakim Tjernlund > > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:45:13 +0100 > > > > > I don't follow. Are these mandatory now? They were not in the old > > > impl. either. > > > > See ether

Re: [PATCH] ucc_geth: Convert to net_device_ops

2009-03-24 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
lloc_etherdev(). > > Yawn... Same here, getting tiered. Should have seen that. Here goes, attatched as well as explained earlier. Jocke >From 651fcd7d1ba494f2e2f20da51196b1b3dccdcd68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joakim Tjernlund Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:09:14 +0100 Subject:

Re: [PATCH] ucc_geth: Convert to net_device_ops

2009-03-24 Thread David Miller
From: Joakim Tjernlund Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:45:13 +0100 > I don't follow. Are these mandatory now? They were not in the old > impl. either. See ether_setup() which is called indirectly via alloc_etherdev(). Yawn... ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list L

Re: [PATCH] ucc_geth: Convert to net_device_ops

2009-03-24 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
David Miller wrote on 24/03/2009 22:22:09: > > From: Joakim Tjernlund > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:37:11 +0100 > > > David Miller wrote on 23/03/2009 19:49:28: > > > > > > From: Joakim Tjernlund > > > Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:17:39 +0100 > > > > > > > Sorry for the WS damaged patch, but my

Re: [PATCH] ucc_geth: Convert to net_device_ops

2009-03-24 Thread David Miller
From: Joakim Tjernlund Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:37:11 +0100 > David Miller wrote on 23/03/2009 19:49:28: > > > > From: Joakim Tjernlund > > Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:17:39 +0100 > > > > > Sorry for the WS damaged patch, but my current company mailer cannot > > > handle inline patches. Due to

Re: [PATCH] ucc_geth: Convert to net_device_ops

2009-03-24 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
David Miller wrote on 23/03/2009 19:49:28: > > From: Joakim Tjernlund > Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:17:39 +0100 > > > Sorry for the WS damaged patch, but my current company mailer cannot > > handle inline patches. Due to this we are setting up a new mail system > > but it will be a few days befor

Re: [PATCH] ucc_geth: Convert to net_device_ops

2009-03-23 Thread David Miller
From: Joakim Tjernlund Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:17:39 +0100 > Sorry for the WS damaged patch, but my current company mailer cannot > handle inline patches. Due to this we are setting up a new mail system > but it will be a few days before this is ready. > Therefore I am attaching this patch as w

[PATCH] ucc_geth: Convert to net_device_ops

2009-03-23 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund --- Sorry for the WS damaged patch, but my current company mailer cannot handle inline patches. Due to this we are setting up a new mail system but it will be a few days before this is ready. Therefore I am attaching this patch as well, use that one to apply instae