Re: [PATCH] spapr: Don't set the TM ibm,pa-features bit in PR KVM mode

2016-04-05 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy
On 04/05/2016 02:09 PM, David Gibson wrote: On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 12:12:01PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 09:09:28PM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote: We don't support transactional memory in PR KVM, so don't tell the OS that we do. This assumes PR KVM won't ever support

Re: [PATCH] spapr: Don't set the TM ibm,pa-features bit in PR KVM mode

2016-04-04 Thread David Gibson
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 12:12:01PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 09:09:28PM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote: > > We don't support transactional memory in PR KVM, so don't tell > > the OS that we do. > > This assumes PR KVM won't ever support TM, which is hopefully not > true.

Re: [PATCH] spapr: Don't set the TM ibm,pa-features bit in PR KVM mode

2016-04-04 Thread Paul Mackerras via Linuxppc-dev
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 09:09:28PM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote: > We don't support transactional memory in PR KVM, so don't tell > the OS that we do. This assumes PR KVM won't ever support TM, which is hopefully not true. If PR KVM does get TM support in future, then QEMU will have no clear way

Re: [PATCH] spapr: Don't set the TM ibm, pa-features bit in PR KVM mode

2016-04-04 Thread Alexander Graf
> Am 04.04.2016 um 13:09 schrieb Anton Blanchard : > > We don't support transactional memory in PR KVM, so don't tell > the OS that we do. > > Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard > --- > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c > index e7be21e..538bd87 100644 > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c > +++ b/h

[PATCH] spapr: Don't set the TM ibm,pa-features bit in PR KVM mode

2016-04-04 Thread Anton Blanchard via Linuxppc-dev
We don't support transactional memory in PR KVM, so don't tell the OS that we do. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard --- diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c index e7be21e..538bd87 100644 --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c @@ -696,6 +696,12 @@ static void spapr_populate_cpu_dt(CPUStat