From: Li Yang
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:08:13 +0800
> IMHO, when device_add() fails the system is quite broken. So the
> value is very limited for it to fail cleanly, which need some effort
> to implement. I can add it if you insist.
I disagree.
For the cases where device_add() fails (duplica
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Michael Ellerman
wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 18:15 +0800, Li Yang wrote:
>> warning: ignoring return value of 'device_add', declared with attribute
>> warn_unused_result
>> warning: ignoring return value of 'sysfs_create_bin_file', declared with
>> attribute w
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 18:15 +0800, Li Yang wrote:
> warning: ignoring return value of 'device_add', declared with attribute
> warn_unused_result
> warning: ignoring return value of 'sysfs_create_bin_file', declared with
> attribute warn_unused_result
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Yang
> ---
> drivers/
warning: ignoring return value of 'device_add', declared with attribute
warn_unused_result
warning: ignoring return value of 'sysfs_create_bin_file', declared with
attribute warn_unused_result
Signed-off-by: Li Yang
---
drivers/rapidio/rio-scan.c |5 -
drivers/rapidio/rio-sysfs.c |
