On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 11:41:47AM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, Linas Vepstas wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:00:37PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 27, Will Schmidt wrote:
>
> > > > > - if (panic_timeout)
> > > > > - return;
> > >
> > > This c
Will Schmidt wrote:
>>From my reading of the papr, I've got the impression that there are two
> possibilities.
>
> First, the os-term never returns, and it's up to the service processor
> to do whatever it's going to do. (call home, dump, something else).
> Nothing we can do there.
>
> Seco
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 16:56 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:15:59 -0600 Will Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > (resending with the proper "from" addr this time).
> >
> >
> > I'm seeing some funky behavior on power5/power6 partitions with this
> > patch.A "/s
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:15:59 -0600 Will Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (resending with the proper "from" addr this time).
>
>
> I'm seeing some funky behavior on power5/power6 partitions with this
> patch.A "/sbin/reboot" is now behaving much more like a
> "/sbin/halt".
>
> Anybody
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 14:18 -0600, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 06:15:59PM -0600, Will Schmidt wrote:
> > (resending with the proper "from" addr this time).
> >
> >
> > I'm seeing some funky behavior on power5/power6 partitions with this
> > patch.A "/sbin/reboot" is now b
On Wed, Nov 28, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:00:37PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, Will Schmidt wrote:
> > > > - if (panic_timeout)
> > > > - return;
> >
> > This change is wrong. Booting with panic=123 really means the system
> > has to r
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 06:15:59PM -0600, Will Schmidt wrote:
> (resending with the proper "from" addr this time).
>
>
> I'm seeing some funky behavior on power5/power6 partitions with this
> patch.A "/sbin/reboot" is now behaving much more like a
> "/sbin/halt".
>
> Anybody else seeing thi
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:00:37PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, Will Schmidt wrote:
>
> > > -void rtas_os_term(char *str)
> > > +void rtas_panic_msg(char *str)
>
> > > - if (panic_timeout)
> > > - return;
>
> This change is wrong. Booting with panic=123 really means the sy
On Tue, Nov 27, Will Schmidt wrote:
> > -void rtas_os_term(char *str)
> > +void rtas_panic_msg(char *str)
> > - if (panic_timeout)
> > - return;
This change is wrong. Booting with panic=123 really means the system
has to reboot in 123 seconds after a panic.
But, maybe this panic_time
(resending with the proper "from" addr this time).
I'm seeing some funky behavior on power5/power6 partitions with this
patch.A "/sbin/reboot" is now behaving much more like a
"/sbin/halt".
Anybody else seeing this, or is it time for me to call an exorcist for
my boxes?
-Will
On Mon, 200
The rtas_os_term() routine was being called at the wrong time.
The actual rtas call "os-term" will not ever return, and so
calling it from the panic notifier is too early. Instead,
call it from the machine_reset() call.
The patch splits the rtas_os_term() routine into two: one
part to capture t
11 matches
Mail list logo
