On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 04:59:16PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On May 24, 2010, at 1:38 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> > From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> >
> > We can't just clear the user read permission in book3e pte, because
> > that will also clear supervisor read permission. This surely isn't
>
On May 24, 2010, at 1:38 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
>
> We can't just clear the user read permission in book3e pte, because
> that will also clear supervisor read permission. This surely isn't
> desired. Fix the problem by adding the supervisor read back.
>
> BenH:
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
We can't just clear the user read permission in book3e pte, because
that will also clear supervisor read permission. This surely isn't
desired. Fix the problem by adding the supervisor read back.
BenH: Slightly simplified the ifdef and applied to ppc64 too
Signed-
On Feb 7, 2010, at 10:21 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 00:53 +0800, Li Yang wrote:
>> We can't just clear the user read permission in book3e pte, because
>> that will also clear supervisor read permission. This surely isn't
>> desired. Fix the problem by adding the s
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 00:53 +0800, Li Yang wrote:
> We can't just clear the user read permission in book3e pte, because
> that will also clear supervisor read permission. This surely isn't
> desired. Fix the problem by adding the supervisor read back.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Yang
> ---
> arch/po
We can't just clear the user read permission in book3e pte, because
that will also clear supervisor read permission. This surely isn't
desired. Fix the problem by adding the supervisor read back.
Signed-off-by: Li Yang
---
arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable_32.c |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertion
