Re: [PATCH] powerpc: enable CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES

2014-02-13 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 13.02.2014 [14:45:49 -0800], David Rientjes wrote: > On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > > Anton Blanchard found an issue with an LPAR that had no memory in Node > > > 0. Christoph Lameter recommended, as one possible solution, to use > > > numa_mem_id() for locality of the ne

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: enable CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES

2014-02-13 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 28.01.2014 [10:34:57 -0800], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > Anton Blanchard found an issue with an LPAR that had no memory in Node > 0. Christoph Lameter recommended, as one possible solution, to use > numa_mem_id() for locality of the nearest memory node-wise. However, > numa_mem_id() [and the ot

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: enable CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES

2014-01-29 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > Anton Blanchard found an issue with an LPAR that had no memory in Node > 0. Christoph Lameter recommended, as one possible solution, to use > numa_mem_id() for locality of the nearest memory node-wise. However, > numa_mem_id() [and the other relate

[PATCH] powerpc: enable CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES

2014-01-28 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
Anton Blanchard found an issue with an LPAR that had no memory in Node 0. Christoph Lameter recommended, as one possible solution, to use numa_mem_id() for locality of the nearest memory node-wise. However, numa_mem_id() [and the other related APIs] are only useful if CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES i