On Tue, 03 Sep 2024 21:19:51 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Since commit 868941b14441 ("fs: remove no_llseek"), no_llseek() is
> simply defined to be NULL, and a NULL llseek means seeking is
> unsupported.
>
> So for statically defined file_operations, such as all these, there's no
> need or ben
Since commit 868941b14441 ("fs: remove no_llseek"), no_llseek() is
simply defined to be NULL, and a NULL llseek means seeking is
unsupported.
So for statically defined file_operations, such as all these, there's no
need or benefit to set llseek = no_llseek.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman
---
a