Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Replaced msleep with usleep_range

2018-07-11 Thread Michael Ellerman
Hi Daniel, Daniel Klamt writes: > Replaced msleep for less than 10ms with usleep_range because will > often sleep longer than intended. > For original explanation see: > Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Klamt > Signed-off-by: Bjoern Noetel > --- > arch/powerpc/sy

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Replaced msleep with usleep_range

2018-07-10 Thread Michael Ellerman
kbuild test robot writes: > Hi Daniel, > > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: > > [auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next] > [also build test ERROR on v4.18-rc4 next-20180709] > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to > help improve the system] >

[PATCH] powerpc: Replaced msleep with usleep_range

2018-07-09 Thread Daniel Klamt
Replaced msleep for less than 10ms with usleep_range because will often sleep longer than intended. For original explanation see: Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt Signed-off-by: Daniel Klamt Signed-off-by: Bjoern Noetel --- arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/native.c | 24 1

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Replaced msleep with usleep_range

2018-07-09 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Mon, 2018-07-09 at 15:57 +0200, Daniel Klamt wrote: > Replaced msleep for less than 10ms with usleep_range because will > often sleep longer than intended. > For original explanation see: > Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt Why ? This is pointless. The original code is smaller and more read

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Replaced msleep with usleep_range

2018-07-09 Thread kbuild test robot
Hi Daniel, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next] [also build test ERROR on v4.18-rc4 next-20180709] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/c