Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Remove more traces of bootmem

2014-11-18 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 16:29 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 10:26 +, David Laight wrote: > > From: Michael Ellerman > > > Although we are now selecting NO_BOOTMEM, we still have some traces of > > > bootmem lying around. That is because even with NO_BOOTMEM there is > > >

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Remove more traces of bootmem

2014-11-18 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 10:26 +, David Laight wrote: > From: Michael Ellerman > > Although we are now selecting NO_BOOTMEM, we still have some traces of > > bootmem lying around. That is because even with NO_BOOTMEM there is > > still a shim that converts bootmem calls into memblock calls, but >

RE: [PATCH] powerpc: Remove more traces of bootmem

2014-11-18 Thread David Laight
From: Michael Ellerman > Although we are now selecting NO_BOOTMEM, we still have some traces of > bootmem lying around. That is because even with NO_BOOTMEM there is > still a shim that converts bootmem calls into memblock calls, but > ultimately we want to remove all traces of bootmem. > > Most o

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Remove more traces of bootmem

2014-11-18 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 17:52 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/setup.c > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/setup.c > index 009a2004b876..86ed156f468f 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/setup.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/setup.c > @@ -125,12 +125,8 @@

[PATCH] powerpc: Remove more traces of bootmem

2014-11-17 Thread Michael Ellerman
Although we are now selecting NO_BOOTMEM, we still have some traces of bootmem lying around. That is because even with NO_BOOTMEM there is still a shim that converts bootmem calls into memblock calls, but ultimately we want to remove all traces of bootmem. Most of the patch is conversions from all