On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 16:19 -0600, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
> I agree, but that means it is impossible for the same .S file can be compiled
> but -mcpu=e500mc and -mcpu=powerpc? So either these files have to be Book3S
> versus Book3E --or-- we use a CPP macro to get them right.
> FWIW, I prefer the lat
On Dec 18, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 07:28 -0600, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
>> On Dec 17, 2012, at 6:26 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
>>> Jimi, are you using an "old" binutils from before my patch that
>>> changed the operand order for these types of instructions?
>>>
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 07:28 -0600, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2012, at 6:26 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > Jimi, are you using an "old" binutils from before my patch that
> > changed the operand order for these types of instructions?
> >
> >http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-02/msg000
> >>dcbtr0,r8,0b01010 /* GO */
> >> .machine pop
> >
> > Jimi, are you using an "old" binutils from before my patch that
> > changed the operand order for these types of instructions?
> >
> >http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-02/msg00044.html
>
> Actually, this confused me as
On Dec 17, 2012, at 6:26 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 22:33 +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>> Hi Jimi,
>>
>>> I know this is a little late, but shouldn't these power7 specific
>>> thingies be in "obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64)". The reason I ask is
>>> that my compiler pukes on
On Dec 17, 2012, at 5:33 AM, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> Hi Jimi,
>
>> I know this is a little late, but shouldn't these power7 specific
>> thingies be in "obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64)". The reason I ask is
>> that my compiler pukes on "dcbtst" and as I deal with that I wanted
>> to point this o
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 22:33 +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> Hi Jimi,
>
> > I know this is a little late, but shouldn't these power7 specific
> > thingies be in "obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64)". The reason I ask is
> > that my compiler pukes on "dcbtst" and as I deal with that I wanted
> > to point th
Hi Jimi,
> I know this is a little late, but shouldn't these power7 specific
> thingies be in "obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64)". The reason I ask is
> that my compiler pukes on "dcbtst" and as I deal with that I wanted
> to point this out.
I guess we could do that. It's a bit strange your assembler
On May 31, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> Implement a POWER7 optimised memcpy using VMX and enhanced prefetch
> instructions.
<>
>
> Index: linux-build/arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile
> ===
> --- linux-build.orig/arch/po
Implement a POWER7 optimised memcpy using VMX and enhanced prefetch
instructions.
This is a copy of the POWER7 optimised copy_to_user/copy_from_user
loop. Detailed implementation and performance details can be found in
commit a66086b8197d (powerpc: POWER7 optimised
copy_to_user/copy_from_user usi
10 matches
Mail list logo