* Nathan Fontenot [2010-07-26 14:13:35]:
> On 07/22/2010 11:13 PM, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> > * Robert Jennings [2010-07-22 21:43:44]:
> >
> >> If a CPU remove is attempted using the 'release' interface on hardware
> >> which supports extended cede, the CPU will be put in the INACTIVE s
On 07/22/2010 11:13 PM, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> * Robert Jennings [2010-07-22 21:43:44]:
>
>> If a CPU remove is attempted using the 'release' interface on hardware
>> which supports extended cede, the CPU will be put in the INACTIVE state
>> rather than the OFFLINE state due to the defa
* Robert Jennings [2010-07-22 21:43:44]:
> If a CPU remove is attempted using the 'release' interface on hardware
> which supports extended cede, the CPU will be put in the INACTIVE state
> rather than the OFFLINE state due to the default preferred_offline_state
> in that situation. In the INACT
If a CPU remove is attempted using the 'release' interface on hardware
which supports extended cede, the CPU will be put in the INACTIVE state
rather than the OFFLINE state due to the default preferred_offline_state
in that situation. In the INACTIVE state it will fail to be removed.
This patch c
