On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 09:56 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> At the moment the handler for hypervisor decrementer interrupts is
> the same as for decrementer interrupts, i.e. timer_interrupt().
> This is bogus; if we ever do get a hypervisor decrementer interrupt
> it won't have anything to do with t
At the moment the handler for hypervisor decrementer interrupts is
the same as for decrementer interrupts, i.e. timer_interrupt().
This is bogus; if we ever do get a hypervisor decrementer interrupt
it won't have anything to do with the next timer event. In fact
the only time we get hypervisor dec
