Linus Walleij writes:
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:57 AM Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
>> I'm struggling to connect the removal of const with those bug reports.
>> It looks like all those warnings are about 0xc000 being
>> outside the range of unsigned long when building 32-bit.
>
> Aha rig
Le 07/11/2023 à 06:57, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> Linus Walleij writes:
>> There is a const in the returned value from pfn_to_kaddr()
>> but there are consumers that want to modify the result
>> and the generic function pfn_to_virt() in
>> does allow this, so let's relax this requirement and
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:57 AM Michael Ellerman wrote:
> I'm struggling to connect the removal of const with those bug reports.
> It looks like all those warnings are about 0xc000 being
> outside the range of unsigned long when building 32-bit.
Aha right. I wonder what actually cause
Linus Walleij writes:
> There is a const in the returned value from pfn_to_kaddr()
> but there are consumers that want to modify the result
> and the generic function pfn_to_virt() in
> does allow this, so let's relax this requirement and do not
> make the returned value const.
>
> Reported-by: k
There is a const in the returned value from pfn_to_kaddr()
but there are consumers that want to modify the result
and the generic function pfn_to_virt() in
does allow this, so let's relax this requirement and do not
make the returned value const.
Reported-by: kernel test robot
Closes:
https://l
