Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Don't use %pK through printk

2025-02-25 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > was suddenly lost from the kernel log, the access to which unprivileged > > users can be denied if so desired according to the site policy. Whereas > > running the kernel such as to have all output from plain `%p' exposed just > > to cope with t

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Don't use %pK through printk

2025-02-25 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > was suddenly lost from the kernel log, the access to which unprivileged > > users can be denied if so desired according to the site policy. Whereas > > running the kernel such as to have all output from plain `%p' exposed just > > to cope with this

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Don't use %pK through printk

2025-02-25 Thread Thomas Weißschuh
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 06:54:47PM +, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Mon, 24 Feb 2025, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > > Restricted pointers ("%pK") are not meant to be used through printk(). > > > It can unintentionally expose security sensitive, raw pointer values. > > > > > > Use regular poin

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Don't use %pK through printk

2025-02-24 Thread Christophe Leroy
Le 24/02/2025 à 19:54, Maciej W. Rozycki a écrit : ***ATTENTION, Sopra Steria Group cannot confirm the identity of this email sender (SPF record failure). This might be a fake email from an attacker, if you have any doubts report and delete the email.*** ***ATTENTION, Sopra Steria Group ne

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Don't use %pK through printk

2025-02-24 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Mon, 24 Feb 2025, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > Restricted pointers ("%pK") are not meant to be used through printk(). > > It can unintentionally expose security sensitive, raw pointer values. > > > > Use regular pointer formatting instead. > > > > Link: > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.o

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Don't use %pK through printk

2025-02-24 Thread Christophe Leroy
Le 17/02/2025 à 08:39, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit : Restricted pointers ("%pK") are not meant to be used through printk(). It can unintentionally expose security sensitive, raw pointer values. Use regular pointer formatting instead. Link: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=ht

[PATCH] powerpc: Don't use %pK through printk

2025-02-16 Thread Thomas Weißschuh
Restricted pointers ("%pK") are not meant to be used through printk(). It can unintentionally expose security sensitive, raw pointer values. Use regular pointer formatting instead. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250113171731-dc10e3c1-da64-4af0-b767-7c7070468...@linutronix.de/ Signed-off-by