This was originally motivated by a desire to see the mapping between
logical and hardware cpu numbers.
But it seemed that it made more sense to just add a command to dump
(most of) the paca.
With no arguments "dp" will dump the paca for the current cpu.
It also takes an argument, eg. "dp 3" whic
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 16:03 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> This was originally motivated by a desire to see the mapping between
> logical and hardware cpu numbers.
Thanks to everyone who reminded me that the paca is 64-bit only :)
New patch on the way.
cheers
_
This was originally motivated by a desire to see the mapping between
logical and hardware cpu numbers.
But it seemed that it made more sense to just add a command to dump
(most of) the paca.
With no arguments "dp" will dump the paca for the current cpu.
It also takes an argument, eg. "dp 3" whic
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 14:44 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 18:45 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 17:52 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > This was originally motivated by a desire to see the mapping between
> > > logical and hardware cpu numb
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 21:07 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:52:40 +1000 Michael Ellerman
> wrote:
> >
> > +#define DUMP(name, format) \
> > + printf(" %-*s = %#-*"format"\t(0x%lx)\n", 16, #name, 18, p->name, \
> > + (u64)((void *)&(p->name) - (
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 18:45 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 17:52 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > This was originally motivated by a desire to see the mapping between
> > logical and hardware cpu numbers.
> >
> > But it seemed that it made more sense to just add a c
Hi Michael,
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:52:40 +1000 Michael Ellerman
wrote:
>
> +#define DUMP(name, format) \
> + printf(" %-*s = %#-*"format"\t(0x%lx)\n", 16, #name, 18, p->name, \
> + (u64)((void *)&(p->name) - (void *)p));
I must say that I hate macros that reference (assumed) glo
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 17:52 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> This was originally motivated by a desire to see the mapping between
> logical and hardware cpu numbers.
>
> But it seemed that it made more sense to just add a command to dump
> (most of) the paca.
>
> With no arguments "dp" will dump
This was originally motivated by a desire to see the mapping between
logical and hardware cpu numbers.
But it seemed that it made more sense to just add a command to dump
(most of) the paca.
With no arguments "dp" will dump the paca for all possible cpus. If
there are no possible cpus, like early
