Tyrel Datwyler writes:
> Ping...
>
> Anybody, see any issues with this patch?
No it looks OK to me.
I'll put it in next. I'm going to drop the stable tag for now, I'd like
it to get some more testing. We can request a backport later.
cheers
Ping...
Anybody, see any issues with this patch?
-Tyrel
On 09/28/2017 05:19 PM, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
When a vdevice is DLPAR removed from the system the vio subsystem doesn't
bother unmapping the virq from the irq_domain. As a result we have a virq
mapped to a hardware irq that is no longer v
When a vdevice is DLPAR removed from the system the vio subsystem doesn't
bother unmapping the virq from the irq_domain. As a result we have a virq
mapped to a hardware irq that is no longer valid for the irq_domain. A side
effect is that we are left with /proc/irq/ affinity entries, and
attempts t
