Re: [PATCH] powerpc/smp: Dynamically build powerpc topology

* Michael Ellerman [2023-10-20 23:10:55]: > Srikar Dronamraju writes: > > Currently there are four powerpc specific sched topologies. These are > > all statically defined. However not all these topologies are used by > > all powerpc systems. > > > > To avoid unnecessary degenerations by the sc

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/smp: Dynamically build powerpc topology

Srikar Dronamraju writes: > Currently there are four powerpc specific sched topologies. These are > all statically defined. However not all these topologies are used by > all powerpc systems. > > To avoid unnecessary degenerations by the scheduler , masks and flags > are compared. However if the

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/smp: Dynamically build powerpc topology

* Peter Zijlstra [2023-09-05 00:10:04]: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 05:56:14PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > Currently there are four powerpc specific sched topologies. These are > > all statically defined. However not all these topologies are used by > > all powerpc systems. > > > > To av

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/smp: Dynamically build powerpc topology

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 05:56:14PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > Currently there are four powerpc specific sched topologies. These are > all statically defined. However not all these topologies are used by > all powerpc systems. > > To avoid unnecessary degenerations by the scheduler , masks

[PATCH] powerpc/smp: Dynamically build powerpc topology

Currently there are four powerpc specific sched topologies. These are all statically defined. However not all these topologies are used by all powerpc systems. To avoid unnecessary degenerations by the scheduler , masks and flags are compared. However if the sched topologies are build dynamicall