On Wed, 2022-03-23 at 16:26 -0300, Murilo Opsfelder Araújo wrote:
> Hi, Russell.
>
> I think this patch could have been split in half with their
> corresponding Fixes: tag.
>
> This may sound nitpicking but doing this would certainly help distros
> doing their backports.
Hi Murilo,
I didn't use
Hi, Russell.
I think this patch could have been split in half with their corresponding
Fixes: tag.
This may sound nitpicking but doing this would certainly help distros doing
their backports.
More comments below.
On 3/22/22 04:47, Russell Currey wrote:
The device-tree properties no-need-l1d
The device-tree properties no-need-l1d-flush-msr-pr-1-to-0,
no-need-l1d-flush-kernel-on-user-access and
no-need-store-drain-on-priv-state-switch are the equivalents of
H_CPU_BEHAV_NO_L1D_FLUSH_ENTRY, H_CPU_BEHAV_NO_L1D_FLUSH_UACCESS
and H_CPU_BEHAV_NO_STF_BARRIER from the H_GET_CPU_CHARACTERISTICS
