Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pci: Support per-aperture memory offset

2013-05-09 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 13:47 +, Sethi Varun-B16395 wrote: > [Sethi Varun-B16395] Tested patch on FSL T4240, P4080, P5040 and P1020 > boards. Thanks. Cheers, Ben. ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/l

RE: [PATCH] powerpc/pci: Support per-aperture memory offset

2013-05-09 Thread Sethi Varun-B16395
rnel.org > Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/pci: Support per-aperture memory offset > > The PCI core supports an offset per aperture nowadays but our arch code > still has a single offset per host bridge representing the difference > betwen CPU memory addresses and PCI MMIO addresses. > >

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pci: Support per-aperture memory offset

2013-05-06 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > The PCI core supports an offset per aperture nowadays but our arch > code still has a single offset per host bridge representing the > difference betwen CPU memory addresses and PCI MMIO addresses. > > This is a problem as new machin

[PATCH] powerpc/pci: Support per-aperture memory offset

2013-05-05 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
The PCI core supports an offset per aperture nowadays but our arch code still has a single offset per host bridge representing the difference betwen CPU memory addresses and PCI MMIO addresses. This is a problem as new machines and hypervisor versions are coming out where the 64-bit windows will h