On 10/04/17 14:02, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 04/10/2017 07:34 AM, Rashmica Gupta wrote:
Current behaviour assumes that memory in RAM is contiguous and
iterates from the start of RAM to (start + size of memory). When the
memory isn't physically contiguous, this approach doesn't work.
In dis
On 04/10/2017 07:34 AM, Rashmica Gupta wrote:
> Current behaviour assumes that memory in RAM is contiguous and
> iterates from the start of RAM to (start + size of memory). When the
> memory isn't physically contiguous, this approach doesn't work.
In dis contiguous platform, we just finish up walk
Current behaviour assumes that memory in RAM is contiguous and
iterates from the start of RAM to (start + size of memory). When the
memory isn't physically contiguous, this approach doesn't work.
If memory exists at 0-5 GB and 6-10 GB then the current approach will
check if entries exist in the ha
