On Monday 13 February 2017 04:40 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
We now get output like below which is much better.
[0.935306] good_mask low_slice: 4-5,9,11-13
[0.935360] good_mask high_slice: 0-511
[0.935385] mask low_slice: 3-6,8,10-12
[0.935397] mask high_slice:
Compared to
We now get output like below which is much better.
[0.935306] good_mask low_slice: 4-5,9,11-13
[0.935360] good_mask high_slice: 0-511
[0.935385] mask low_slice: 3-6,8,10-12
[0.935397] mask high_slice:
Compared to
[0.953414] good_mask: - 1.