On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 07:11:18PM +, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> Should be Reported-by Timur, right?
>
>Technically, yes. For the record, I don't care about these things.
>It implies that only willing to report the problem, but too lazy to
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Should be Reported-by Timur, right?
Technically, yes. For the record, I don't care about these things.
It implies that only willing to report the problem, but too lazy to
fix it; which is true, but I'd hate to see that fact permanently
etched
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `machine_check_e500mc':
> arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c:429: undefined reference to
> `fsl_rio_mcheck_exception'
> arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `machine_check_e500':
> arch/powerpc/kerne
arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `machine_check_e500mc':
arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c:429: undefined reference to
`fsl_rio_mcheck_exception'
arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `machine_check_e500':
arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c:519:
undefined reference to `fsl_rio_mcheck_exceptio
