On Jun 22, 2011, at 6:10 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> e500mc cannot doze or nap due to an erratum (as well as having a
> different mechanism than previous e500), but it has a "wait" instruction
> that is similar to doze.
>
> On 64-bit, due to the soft-irq-disable mechanism, the existing
> book3e_idle
e500mc cannot doze or nap due to an erratum (as well as having a
different mechanism than previous e500), but it has a "wait" instruction
that is similar to doze.
On 64-bit, due to the soft-irq-disable mechanism, the existing
book3e_idle should be used instead.
Signed-off-by: Vakul Garg
Signed-o
