On 09/07/2012 02:34 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/06/2012 11:23 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 17:02 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> It was branching to the cleanup part of the non-bolted handler,
>>> which would have been bad if there were any chips with tlbsrx.
>>> that u
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 17:02 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> It was branching to the cleanup part of the non-bolted handler,
> which would have been bad if there were any chips with tlbsrx.
> that use the bolted handler.
Still relevant ? It doesn't apply anymore :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
> Signed-off-by: Scott
It was branching to the cleanup part of the non-bolted handler,
which would have been bad if there were any chips with tlbsrx.
that use the bolted handler.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood
---
arch/powerpc/mm/tlb_low_64e.S |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/
