On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 14:38:57 -0500
Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Apr 6, 2011, at 1:02 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 07:29:03 -0500
> > Kumar Gala wrote:
> >
> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h
> >> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h
> >> index be3cdf9..9028a9e
On Apr 6, 2011, at 1:02 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 07:29:03 -0500
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h
>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h
>> index be3cdf9..9028a9e 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h
>> +++ b/arch/power
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 07:29:03 -0500
Kumar Gala wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h
> index be3cdf9..9028a9e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h
> @@ -386,6 +386,10 @@ extern con
The CPU_FTRS_POSSIBLE and CPU_FTRS_ALWAYS defines did not encompass
e5500 CPU features when built for 64-bit. This causes issues with
cpu_has_feature() as it utilizes the POSSIBLE & ALWAYS defines as part
of its check.
Create a unique CPU_FTRS_E5500 (as its different from CPU_FTRS_E500MC),
create