On Nov 30, 2011, at 10:19 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Commit 46d026ac ("powerpc/85xx: consolidate of_platform_bus_probe calls")
> replaced platform-specific of_device_id tables with a single function
> that probes the most of the busses in 85xx device trees. If a specific
> platform needed additiona
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:18:10 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Grant, do you have a moment to consider my question? Like I said, I'm
> anxious to get a fix into 3.3.
I've been out of town for the past week, so email processing volume
has been low. Answer below.
> Timur Tabi wrote:
> > Timur Tabi wrot
Grant, do you have a moment to consider my question? Like I said, I'm
anxious to get a fix into 3.3.
Timur Tabi wrote:
> Timur Tabi wrote:
>> They only problem I see with this is that I am thinking about modifying
>> the drivers/dma driver to probe on "fsl,eloplus-dma-channel" channels
>> directl
Timur Tabi wrote:
> They only problem I see with this is that I am thinking about modifying
> the drivers/dma driver to probe on "fsl,eloplus-dma-channel" channels
> directly. If I do that, then who should call of_platform_populate()?
Grant, could you tell me if there's anything actually work wit
On Mar 19, 2012, at 11:04 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:50:44 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
>> Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>>> This seems like paper taping over the real issue. We should be able to
>>> call of_platform_bus_probe() multiple times.
>>
>> I tried debugging it, but I coul
Grant Likely wrote:
> Does a driver bind against "fsl,eloplus-dma"? If so, then I would
> call of_platform_populate() from within the fsl,eloplus-dma driver's
> probe method.
Well, there are two "DMA" drivers.
The one in drivers/dma binds on fsl,eloplus-dma, and then manually scans
for children
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:43:29 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Grant Likely wrote:
> > The problem is that you want to create devices for grandchildren
> > nodes when the bus ids passed in don't match any of the child nodes so
> > the of_platform_bus_probe() doesn't iterate down to that level. This
> >
Grant Likely wrote:
> The problem is that you want to create devices for grandchildren
> nodes when the bus ids passed in don't match any of the child nodes so
> the of_platform_bus_probe() doesn't iterate down to that level. This
> is correct and expected behaviour.
Well, I'm not still not 100%
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:50:44 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> > This seems like paper taping over the real issue. We should be able to
> > call of_platform_bus_probe() multiple times.
>
> I tried debugging it, but I couldn't figure it out. My guess is that the
> nodes probed b
Kumar Gala wrote:
> This seems like paper taping over the real issue. We should be able to call
> of_platform_bus_probe() multiple times.
I tried debugging it, but I couldn't figure it out. My guess is that the
nodes probed by of_platform_bus_probe() are somehow "reserved", so that
the second
On Nov 30, 2011, at 10:19 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Commit 46d026ac ("powerpc/85xx: consolidate of_platform_bus_probe calls")
> replaced platform-specific of_device_id tables with a single function
> that probes the most of the busses in 85xx device trees. If a specific
> platform needed additiona
Timur Tabi wrote:
> Commit 46d026ac ("powerpc/85xx: consolidate of_platform_bus_probe calls")
> replaced platform-specific of_device_id tables with a single function
> that probes the most of the busses in 85xx device trees. If a specific
> platform needed additional busses probed, then it could c
Commit 46d026ac ("powerpc/85xx: consolidate of_platform_bus_probe calls")
replaced platform-specific of_device_id tables with a single function
that probes the most of the busses in 85xx device trees. If a specific
platform needed additional busses probed, then it could call
of_platform_bus_probe(
13 matches
Mail list logo
