On Feb 18, 2010, at 7:45 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> Interrupt controllers' hooks are executed in the atomic context, so
> they are not permitted to sleep (with RT kernels non-raw spinlocks are
> sleepable). So, socrates_fpga_pic_lock has to be a real (non-sleepable)
> spinlock.
>
> Signed-off-
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> Interrupt controllers' hooks are executed in the atomic context, so
> they are not permitted to sleep (with RT kernels non-raw spinlocks are
> sleepable). So, socrates_fpga_pic_lock has to be a real (non-sleepable)
> spinlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton
Interrupt controllers' hooks are executed in the atomic context, so
they are not permitted to sleep (with RT kernels non-raw spinlocks are
sleepable). So, socrates_fpga_pic_lock has to be a real (non-sleepable)
spinlock.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov
---
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:22:18PM -
