Re: [PATCH] powerpc/64: Fix stacktrace on BE when function_graph is enabled

Michael Ellerman wrote: "Naveen N. Rao" writes: Michael Ellerman wrote: Currently if we oops or warn while function_graph is active the stack trace looks like: .trace_graph_return+0xac/0x100 .ftrace_return_to_handler+0x98/0x140 .return_to_handler+0x20/0x40 .return_to_handler+0x0/0x40

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/64: Fix stacktrace on BE when function_graph is enabled

"Naveen N. Rao" writes: > Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Currently if we oops or warn while function_graph is active the stack >> trace looks like: >> .trace_graph_return+0xac/0x100 >> .ftrace_return_to_handler+0x98/0x140 >> .return_to_handler+0x20/0x40 >> .return_to_handler+0x0/0x40 >> .ret

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/64: Fix stacktrace on BE when function_graph is enabled

Michael Ellerman wrote: Currently if we oops or warn while function_graph is active the stack trace looks like: .trace_graph_return+0xac/0x100 .ftrace_return_to_handler+0x98/0x140 .return_to_handler+0x20/0x40 .return_to_handler+0x0/0x40 .return_to_handler+0x0/0x40 .return_to_handler+0

[PATCH] powerpc/64: Fix stacktrace on BE when function_graph is enabled

Currently if we oops or warn while function_graph is active the stack trace looks like: .trace_graph_return+0xac/0x100 .ftrace_return_to_handler+0x98/0x140 .return_to_handler+0x20/0x40 .return_to_handler+0x0/0x40 .return_to_handler+0x0/0x40 .return_to_handler+0x0/0x40 .return_to_handl