On 7/16/2012 11:57 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:43:33PM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
TCP_STREAM from this setup before the patch would be good to know as well
Does the stream test that I did with uperf using messages of 64000 bytes fit?
netperf/TCP_STREA
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Rick Jones wrote:
> I was thinking more along the lines of an additional comparison,
> explicitly using netperf TCP_RR or something like it, not just the packets
> per second from a bulk transfer test.
TCP_STREAM from this setup before the patch would be good t
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Rick Jones wrote:
> I was thinking more along the lines of an additional comparison,
> explicitly using netperf TCP_RR or something like it, not just the packets
> per second from a bulk transfer test.
>
TCP_STREAM would be good to know here as well
Or.
___
I was thinking more along the lines of an additional comparison,
explicitly using netperf TCP_RR or something like it, not just the
packets per second from a bulk transfer test.
rick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.k
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:43:33PM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Rick Jones wrote:
>
> > I was thinking more along the lines of an additional comparison,
> > explicitly using netperf TCP_RR or something like it, not just the packets
> > per second from a bulk transf
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:42:41PM -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
> On 07/16/2012 12:06 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
> >
> >>What is the effect on packet-per-second performance? (eg aggregate,
> >>burst-mode netperf TCP_RR with T
On 07/16/2012 12:06 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
What is the effect on packet-per-second performance? (eg aggregate,
burst-mode netperf TCP_RR with TCP_NODELAY set or perhaps UDP_RR)
I used uperf with TCP_NODELAY and 16
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:27:57AM -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
> On 07/16/2012 10:01 AM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> >In its receive path, mlx4_en driver maps each page chunk that it pushes
> >to the hardware and unmaps it when pushing it up the stack. This limits
> >throughput to about 3Gb
