On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 11:08:02AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Commit ed5c2f5fd10d ("i2c: Make remove callback return void") changed
> the prototype of ams_i2c_remove() but failed to adapt the declaration.
> Catch up and fix the declaration accordingly.
>
> Fixes: ed5c2f5fd10d ("i2c: Make rem
Wolfram Sang writes:
>> I don't know how to proceed with this fix. Squashing into the broken
>> commit is out of the game as the commit is on a stable branch that is
>> already merged in a few trees. Maybe let it go in via the i2c tree?
>
> I think it would be simplest if I put it on top of my for
> I don't know how to proceed with this fix. Squashing into the broken
> commit is out of the game as the commit is on a stable branch that is
> already merged in a few trees. Maybe let it go in via the i2c tree?
I think it would be simplest if I put it on top of my for-next branch.
The other opt
Commit ed5c2f5fd10d ("i2c: Make remove callback return void") changed
the prototype of ams_i2c_remove() but failed to adapt the declaration.
Catch up and fix the declaration accordingly.
Fixes: ed5c2f5fd10d ("i2c: Make remove callback return void")
Reported-by: kernel test robot
Signed-off-by: Uw
