Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: do not depend on CONFIG_BLOCK

2018-11-27 Thread Kees Cook
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 7:59 AM, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > On 11/27/2018 07:43 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 07:05:51AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote: >>> >>> Most parts of lkdtm don't require CONFIG_BLOCK. >>> >>> This patch limits dependency to CONFIG_BLOCK in o

Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: do not depend on CONFIG_BLOCK

2018-11-27 Thread Christophe Leroy
On 11/27/2018 07:43 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 07:05:51AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote: Most parts of lkdtm don't require CONFIG_BLOCK. This patch limits dependency to CONFIG_BLOCK in order to give embedded platforms which don't select CONFIG_BLOCK the opportunity

Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: do not depend on CONFIG_BLOCK

2018-11-26 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 07:05:51AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote: > Most parts of lkdtm don't require CONFIG_BLOCK. > > This patch limits dependency to CONFIG_BLOCK in order to give embedded > platforms which don't select CONFIG_BLOCK the opportunity to use LKDTM. > > Fixes: fddd9cf82c9f ("make L

[PATCH] lkdtm: do not depend on CONFIG_BLOCK

2018-11-08 Thread Christophe Leroy
Most parts of lkdtm don't require CONFIG_BLOCK. This patch limits dependency to CONFIG_BLOCK in order to give embedded platforms which don't select CONFIG_BLOCK the opportunity to use LKDTM. Fixes: fddd9cf82c9f ("make LKDTM depend on BLOCK") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy --- drivers/misc/lkdt