Re: [PATCH] list_for_each_rcu must die: networking

2008-05-14 Thread David Miller
From: Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 10:56:07 +0530 > Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > All uses of list_for_each_rcu() can be profitably replaced by the > > easier-to-use list_for_each_entry_rcu(). This patch makes this change > > for networking, in preparation for removin

Re: [PATCH] list_for_each_rcu must die: networking

2008-05-14 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
Paul E. McKenney wrote: > All uses of list_for_each_rcu() can be profitably replaced by the > easier-to-use list_for_each_entry_rcu(). This patch makes this change > for networking, in preparation for removing the list_for_each_rcu() > API entirely. > > Updated to remove the two now-unused variab

[PATCH] list_for_each_rcu must die: networking

2008-05-14 Thread Paul E. McKenney
All uses of list_for_each_rcu() can be profitably replaced by the easier-to-use list_for_each_entry_rcu(). This patch makes this change for networking, in preparation for removing the list_for_each_rcu() API entirely. Updated to remove the two now-unused variables as noted by Dave Miller, and als