On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 21:24 -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 17:36 -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> > > I think this code that counts SMT threads and compares against NR_CPUS
> > > is an artifact of pre-powerpc-merge ppc64. We care about starting
> >
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:55:51PM -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> sysfs. (e.g. /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/physical_id)
Hmm okay, sysfs is fine if you're gettign all the way up. I guess if we
have problems in that are we can readd the printf().
> The proper place for such a message is in the k
Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 05:36:31PM -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote:
>
> > - prom_printf("%x : starting cpu hw idx %x... ", cpuid,
> > reg);
> > + prom_printf("starting cpu hw idx %x... ", reg);
>
> If we remove this, where else can we see the ma
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 17:36 -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> > I think this code that counts SMT threads and compares against NR_CPUS
> > is an artifact of pre-powerpc-merge ppc64. We care about starting
> > only primary threads in the OF client code.
> >
> > Signed-of
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 05:36:31PM -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> I think this code that counts SMT threads and compares against NR_CPUS
> is an artifact of pre-powerpc-merge ppc64. We care about starting
> only primary threads in the OF client code.
> - prom_printf("%x : star
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 17:36 -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> I think this code that counts SMT threads and compares against NR_CPUS
> is an artifact of pre-powerpc-merge ppc64. We care about starting
> only primary threads in the OF client code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Th
I think this code that counts SMT threads and compares against NR_CPUS
is an artifact of pre-powerpc-merge ppc64. We care about starting
only primary threads in the OF client code.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c | 39 +++-
