Re: [PATCH] ibmvfc: Protect vhost->task_set increment by the host lock

On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 15:09:59 -0500, Brian King wrote: > In the discovery thread, ibmvfc does a vhost->task_set++ without > any lock held. This could result in two targets getting the same > cancel key, which could have strange effects in error recovery. > The actual probability of this occurring s

Re: [PATCH] ibmvfc: Protect vhost->task_set increment by the host lock

Brian, > In the discovery thread, ibmvfc does a vhost->task_set++ without any > lock held. This could result in two targets getting the same cancel > key, which could have strange effects in error recovery. The actual > probability of this occurring should be extremely small, since this > shoul

[PATCH] ibmvfc: Protect vhost->task_set increment by the host lock

In the discovery thread, ibmvfc does a vhost->task_set++ without any lock held. This could result in two targets getting the same cancel key, which could have strange effects in error recovery. The actual probability of this occurring should be extremely small, since this should all be done in a si