On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 18:58 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > I guess them being "two short" is why they needed to be
> doubled. :-)
> >
> > Well, in that case, it makes sense, it's still pretty short and
> better
> > safe than sorry. On day I may look at actually measuring PHYs and
> see if
> > it
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 08:22:38 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 16:57 -0400, Bill Fink wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > > This patch doubles the MDIO timeouts in EMAC as there are field
> > > cases where they are
On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 16:57 -0400, Bill Fink wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > This patch doubles the MDIO timeouts in EMAC as there are field
> > cases where they are two short to communicate with some PHYs.
>
> I guess them being "two short" is why they needed t
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> This patch doubles the MDIO timeouts in EMAC as there are field
> cases where they are two short to communicate with some PHYs.
I guess them being "two short" is why they needed to be doubled. :-)
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
This patch doubles the MDIO timeouts in EMAC as there are field
cases where they are two short to communicate with some PHYs.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
applied
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing l
This patch doubles the MDIO timeouts in EMAC as there are field
cases where they are two short to communicate with some PHYs.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/ibm_newemac/core.c |8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- linux-w
