On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 16:35 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > are you going to take this patch? The issue appears to me for a
> long time
>
> I guess. Ben's response was a bit equivocal. But I guess he meant
> "seems
> OK". So yeah I'll pick it up for 4.10.
Yeah... seems ok. I haven't touched th
Denis Kirjanov writes:
> On 9/21/16, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>> That's unclear why lockdep shows the following warning but adding a
>> lockdep class to struct pmac_i2c_bus solves it
>>
>> [ 20.507795] ==
>> [ 20.507796] [ INFO: possible circu
On 9/21/16, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> That's unclear why lockdep shows the following warning but adding a
> lockdep class to struct pmac_i2c_bus solves it
>
> [ 20.507795] ==
> [ 20.507796] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected
On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 14:00 +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 21, 2016, Denis Kirjanov rg> wrote:
> > That's unclear why lockdep shows the following warning but adding a
> > lockdep class to struct pmac_i2c_bus solves it
>
> HI Ben,
>
> could you give any comments on
On Wednesday, September 21, 2016, Denis Kirjanov
wrote:
> That's unclear why lockdep shows the following warning but adding a
> lockdep class to struct pmac_i2c_bus solves it
HI Ben,
could you give any comments on this?
Thanks!
>
> [ 20.507795] =
That's unclear why lockdep shows the following warning but adding a
lockdep class to struct pmac_i2c_bus solves it
[ 20.507795] ==
[ 20.507796] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[ 20.507800] 4.8.0-rc7-00037-gd2ffb01 #2
