On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 14:22 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> So, I shouldn't apply this patch? We should do something to fix this,
> if Debian has to drag this patch on for 5 years, that's an indication
> that this might be one solution we should use, right?
Ah sorry, dropped the ball on that
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 09:55:40AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 17:24 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > The original version of this was done by Bastian Blank, who wrote:
> >
> > > The problem is the following:
> > > - Architecture specific code sets preferred console
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 17:24 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> The original version of this was done by Bastian Blank, who wrote:
>
> > The problem is the following:
> > - Architecture specific code sets preferred console to something bogus.
> > - Command line handling tries to set preferred console bu
The original version of this was done by Bastian Blank, who wrote:
> The problem is the following:
> - Architecture specific code sets preferred console to something bogus.
> - Command line handling tries to set preferred console but is overruled
> by the old setting.
>
> The udbg0 console is a
