Hi abdoulaye,
On Fri, 30 May 2014 01:16:22 +0200 abdoulaye berthe wrote:
>
> The aim of this patch is to make gpiochip_remove() behavior consistent,
> especially when issuing a remove request while the chipio chip is
> still requested. A patch has been submitted to change the return value of
> gp
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:54:52PM +0200, abdoulaye berthe wrote:
> Signed-off-by: abdoulaye berthe
Why?
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Hi David,
The aim of this patch is to make gpiochip_remove() behavior consistent,
especially when issuing a remove request while the chipio chip is
still requested. A patch has been submitted to change the return value of
gpiochip_remove() from int to void. This one updates users of the return
valu
On 05/29/2014 02:54 PM, abdoulaye berthe wrote:
Did you forget a changelog explaining why this is either needed, or even
a good idea? I joined the conversation late and don't know why you are
doing this.
Thanks,
David Daney
Signed-off-by: abdoulaye berthe
---
arch/arm/common/scoop.c
