> > -
> gfar_tx_checksum(skb, fcb);
> > + switch
> (unlikely(gfar_has_errata(priv, GFAR_ERRATA_12))
> > +
> ? 1 : 0) {
>
> The switch construction is quite bizarre. ;-) Why not
>
My testing shows that even on broken chips unaligned packets are quite rare
(only some SYN p
Please CC: netdev on future submissions of this patch, otherwise I
won't see it in my queue.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Hello Alex,
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:14:21AM -0800, Alex Dubov wrote:
> As specified by errata eTSEC49 of MPC8548 and errata eTSEC12 of MPC83xx,
> older revisions of gianfar controllers will be unable to calculate a TCP/UDP
> packet checksum for some aligments of the appropriate FCB. This patch
As specified by errata eTSEC49 of MPC8548 and errata eTSEC12 of MPC83xx,
older revisions of gianfar controllers will be unable to calculate a TCP/UDP
packet checksum for some aligments of the appropriate FCB. This patch checks
for FCB alignment on such controllers and falls back to software checksu
