On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 15:02 -0700, Feng Kan wrote:
> Ok thanks. This short string match may be useful in some cases, but I
> agree it plays havoc with the current code.
Yeah well, it's not actually -that- useful and is definitely broken :-)
If you want multiples matches, then it's the compatible
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 07:48 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 10:41 -0700, Feng Kan wrote:
>> > From: Feng Kan
>> >
>> > The current matching scheme make the pci node match to pcix or pciex node.
>> > To
Ok thanks. This short string match may be useful in some cases, but I
agree it plays havoc with the current code.
Feng Kan
On Mar 30, 2010, at 14:14, "Benjamin Herrenschmidt" > wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 07:48 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 10:41 -0700, Feng K
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 07:48 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 10:41 -0700, Feng Kan wrote:
> > From: Feng Kan
> >
> > The current matching scheme make the pci node match to pcix or pciex node.
> > To avoid the match, change the method so only one type of initialization
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 10:41 -0700, Feng Kan wrote:
> From: Feng Kan
>
> The current matching scheme make the pci node match to pcix or pciex node.
> To avoid the match, change the method so only one type of initialization
> is called per node.
No, your patch is not right. The problem was introdu
From: Feng Kan
The current matching scheme make the pci node match to pcix or pciex node.
To avoid the match, change the method so only one type of initialization
is called per node.
Signed-off-by: Feng Kan
Signed-off-by: Tirumala R Marri
---
arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_pci.c | 14 --
