On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 06:06:19PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 05:58:53PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 05:22:59PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > > OK, I see what you mean now. It's wrong indeed.
> > >
> > > The trouble is the ZON
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 05:58:53PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 05:22:59PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > OK, I see what you mean now. It's wrong indeed.
> >
> > The trouble is the ZONE_DMA series[1] in arm64, also due for v5.5, will be
> > affected by this p
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 05:22:59PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> OK, I see what you mean now. It's wrong indeed.
>
> The trouble is the ZONE_DMA series[1] in arm64, also due for v5.5, will be
> affected by this patch. I don't know the right way to approach this problem
> since depending o
On Thu, 2019-10-31 at 16:57 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 04:53:13PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > > > +#define ARM64_ZONE_DMA_BITS30
> > > > +
> > > > /*
> > > > * We need to be able to catch inadvertent references to memstart_addr
> > > > * that occ
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 04:53:13PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > > +#define ARM64_ZONE_DMA_BITS 30
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * We need to be able to catch inadvertent references to memstart_addr
> > > * that occur (potentially in generic code) before arm64_memblock_init()
> > > @@
On Thu, 2019-10-31 at 16:47 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 04:28:37PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > Some architectures, notably ARM, are interested in tweaking this
> > depending on their runtime DMA addressing limitations.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 04:28:37PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> Some architectures, notably ARM, are interested in tweaking this
> depending on their runtime DMA addressing limitations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne
> ---
>
> Changes since RFC:
> - Rebased to v5.4-rc6, fix
Some architectures, notably ARM, are interested in tweaking this
depending on their runtime DMA addressing limitations.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne
---
Changes since RFC:
- Rebased to v5.4-rc6, fixed arm64 code.
NOTE: This will only apply to linux-next, where
arch/arm64/mm/init.c